Network Services Compliance: HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and Federal Requirements
Network compliance frameworks impose binding technical and administrative controls on any organization that transmits, stores, or processes regulated data across its infrastructure. HIPAA governs protected health information in healthcare environments, PCI-DSS governs payment card data across retail and financial networks, and federal frameworks such as FedRAMP and FISMA govern systems operated by or for US government agencies. Understanding where each framework applies, how its controls map to network architecture, and where enforcement boundaries fall is essential for any organization designing or procuring network security services or enterprise networking services.
Definition and scope
HIPAA — the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 — establishes the Security Rule (45 CFR §§ 164.302–164.318), which mandates administrative, physical, and technical safeguards for electronic protected health information (ePHI). The Security Rule applies to covered entities (health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, most healthcare providers) and their business associates. Network controls directly implicated include access controls, audit logging, transmission security (encryption in transit), and automatic logoff requirements.
PCI-DSS — the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard — is published and maintained by the PCI Security Standards Council. Version 4.0, released in March 2022, contains 12 top-level requirements organized around six control objectives. Network-specific requirements appear primarily in Requirements 1 (network security controls), 2 (secure configurations), and 4 (encryption of cardholder data over open, public networks). Any network segment that touches the cardholder data environment (CDE) falls within scope.
FISMA — the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 — requires federal agencies and their contractors to implement security programs aligned with NIST SP 800-53 controls. FedRAMP (Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program) extends FISMA requirements to cloud service providers, mandating an independent third-party assessment before a cloud offering can be authorized for federal use.
The scope boundary is the critical variable: an organization subject to more than one framework — a healthcare system accepting card payments, for example — must satisfy the union of all applicable control sets, not the intersection.
How it works
Compliance under each framework proceeds through a structured lifecycle:
- Scoping — Identify which systems, network segments, and data flows are subject to each framework. For PCI-DSS, this means delineating the CDE and minimizing its footprint through segmentation. For HIPAA, it means mapping every system that creates, receives, maintains, or transmits ePHI.
- Risk analysis — HIPAA explicitly requires a documented, organization-wide risk analysis (45 CFR § 164.308(a)(1)). NIST SP 800-30 provides the risk assessment methodology most widely used for FISMA-covered systems.
- Control implementation — Controls are implemented at the network layer (firewalls, segmentation, encryption), the endpoint layer (access control, patching), and the administrative layer (policies, training, vendor agreements). Network infrastructure services and SD-WAN services are frequently redesigned during this phase to enforce segmentation boundaries.
- Validation — PCI-DSS requires either a Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) or a Report on Compliance (ROC) prepared by a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA), depending on transaction volume. HIPAA has no mandatory external audit, but HHS Office for Civil Rights conducts investigations following breach notifications. FedRAMP requires a full assessment by a Third Party Assessment Organization (3PAO).
- Continuous monitoring — NIST SP 800-137 defines the continuous monitoring strategy for federal systems. PCI-DSS Requirement 10 mandates log management and alerting. HIPAA requires periodic review of audit logs and access controls. Network monitoring services operationalize this phase.
Common scenarios
Healthcare network segmentation — A hospital network must isolate ePHI-processing systems (EHR servers, medical devices) from guest Wi-Fi and administrative segments. HIPAA's transmission security requirement (45 CFR § 164.312(e)(1)) mandates encryption or an equivalent alternative measure. Unencrypted ePHI traversing a shared segment is a recurring finding in HHS OCR audit results. Network services for healthcare covers this environment in greater detail.
Retail point-of-sale segmentation — A retailer using a flat network topology where POS terminals share segments with back-office workstations places the entire network in PCI-DSS scope. Proper segmentation reduces scope to only the POS segment and the systems that administer it, significantly reducing the number of controls that must be validated.
Federal contractor cloud migration — A Department of Defense contractor migrating workloads to a commercial cloud must use a FedRAMP-authorized offering at the appropriate impact level (Low, Moderate, or High). CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification), released by the Department of Defense, adds a third-party certification layer on top of NIST SP 800-171 for contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).
Decision boundaries
The table below maps key framework selection criteria:
| Framework | Trigger condition | Primary network control requirement |
|---|---|---|
| HIPAA Security Rule | ePHI created, received, maintained, or transmitted | Transmission encryption, access controls, audit logging |
| PCI-DSS | Cardholder data stored, processed, or transmitted | CDE segmentation, firewall rules, TLS for data in transit |
| FISMA / NIST 800-53 | Federal agency system or contractor operating on behalf of an agency | Control baseline (Low/Moderate/High) per FIPS 199 categorization |
| FedRAMP | Cloud service provider selling to federal agencies | 3PAO assessment, continuous monitoring, POA&M management |
| CMMC | DoD contractor handling CUI | Tiered certification (Level 1–3) mapped to NIST SP 800-171 |
HIPAA vs. PCI-DSS comparison — HIPAA is risk-based: it mandates outcomes (protect ePHI) and permits flexibility in how controls are implemented, requiring compensating controls to be documented when a standard implementation is infeasible. PCI-DSS is prescriptive: specific technical controls are enumerated, and deviation requires a formal compensating control worksheet reviewed by a QSA. For network compliance and regulatory requirements that span both frameworks, the prescriptive PCI-DSS requirements typically set the higher technical bar and are implemented first, with HIPAA risk analysis confirming residual risk acceptability.
Organizations evaluating zero trust network services should note that NIST SP 800-207 (Zero Trust Architecture) is now referenced in federal procurement guidance and aligns directly with the microsegmentation principles underlying both HIPAA network isolation requirements and PCI-DSS CDE scoping.
References
- HHS Office for Civil Rights — HIPAA Security Rule
- PCI Security Standards Council — PCI-DSS v4.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 — Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems
- NIST SP 800-207 — Zero Trust Architecture
- FedRAMP Program — General Services Administration
- CMMC — Department of Defense
- NIST SP 800-30 Rev. 1 — Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments
- NIST SP 800-137 — Information Security Continuous Monitoring
On this site
- Types of Networking Services: A Complete Reference
- Managed Network Services: What They Include and How They Work
- Network Infrastructure Services: Components and Considerations
- Cloud Networking Services: Connectivity and Architecture Options
- Enterprise Networking Services: Scope, Scale, and Selection Criteria
- Networking Services for Small Businesses: What to Look For
- Wide Area Network (WAN) Services: Types and Provider Comparison
- Local Area Network (LAN) Services: Setup, Management, and Support
- SD-WAN Services: How Software-Defined WAN Changes Networking
- Network Security Services: Firewalls, VPNs, and Threat Management
- Wireless Networking Services: Wi-Fi Design, Deployment, and Support
- Network Monitoring Services: Tools, Metrics, and Provider Options
- Managed Detection and Response for Networks: Service Breakdown
- VoIP and Unified Communications Networking Services
- Network Consulting Services: Assessment, Design, and Strategy
- Network Design and Architecture Services: What Providers Deliver
- Network Installation Services: Cabling, Hardware, and Configuration
- Network Support and Maintenance Services: SLAs and Coverage Models
- Network as a Service (NaaS): Definition, Use Cases, and Providers
- Fiber Optic Networking Services: Infrastructure and Provider Selection
- Data Center Networking Services: Connectivity and Colocation Considerations
- Network Virtualization Services: SDN, NFV, and Virtual Overlays
- IoT Networking Services: Connectivity for Connected Devices
- Multicloud Networking Services: Interconnecting Multiple Cloud Environments
- Outsourcing Network Management: Key Considerations and Trade-offs
- How to Evaluate and Select a Network Service Provider
- Network Services Pricing Models: Understanding Contracts and Costs
- Network Redundancy and Failover Services: Ensuring Uptime and Resilience
- Network Performance Optimization Services: Latency, Throughput, and QoS
- Private Network Services: MPLS, Dedicated Lines, and Leased Circuits
- Networking Services for Healthcare Organizations: Requirements and Providers
- Networking Services for Educational Institutions: K-12 and Higher Ed
- Networking Services for Government Agencies: Federal, State, and Local
- Networking Services Glossary: Key Terms and Definitions
- Industry Standards Governing Networking Services: IEEE, IETF, and Beyond
- Zero Trust Network Services: Architecture, Principles, and Implementation
- Frequently Asked Questions About Networking Services